procurement · packaging
Cartridge, sausage or barrel: pack economics
Updated 2026-11-10
Pack format is a production decision disguised as a purchasing one. The same sealant costs different amounts per metre depending on how it is supplied, and the difference is mostly labour and waste.
The three formats
| Format | Typical use | Advantage | Cost driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 310 ml cartridge | Repair, low volume | Cheap gun, precise | Highest cost per litre, most packaging waste |
| 400/600 ml sausage | Body shop production | Less changeover, lower waste | Needs a sausage gun |
| 200 L barrel | Line production | Lowest cost per litre | Pump system, minimum volume, cleaning |
Where the money goes
A cartridge leaves 5–8% of product behind and needs a new nozzle per tube. A sausage leaves less, and a barrel with a follower plate leaves least — but a barrel that sits half-used between shifts can skin over and cost more than it saved.
The break-even is roughly: below 20 cartridges a week, cartridges are fine; above that, sausages pay for the gun in a few months; above a barrel a week, a pump system starts to make sense.
A changeover calculation
Take a line that runs 40 cartridges a week of one sealer. Each cartridge change costs roughly a minute of gun time plus a nozzle; a sausage change costs the same minute but covers 400–600 ml instead of 310. Over a week that is 40 interruptions versus roughly 25, before counting the 5–8% left in each cartridge.
The saving is not the adhesive price — it is the interruptions and the waste. The same logic explains why barrels win on high-volume lines and lose in a workshop that cannot finish one inside its working life.
Waste arithmetic
The residual product in a cartridge is not a rounding error when a shop uses forty a week.
310 ml cartridge, 7% residual ≈ 22 ml lost per cartridge
40 cartridges per week ≈ 880 ml lost per week
600 ml sausage, 3% residual ≈ 18 ml per sausage
25 sausages per week ≈ 450 ml lost per week
At a product cost of USD 6 per 310 ml, the cartridge waste is about USD 17 a week — small. The interruptions are not: forty cartridge changes a week is forty chances for an air pocket, a dropped nozzle or a bead that starts thin.
The barrel case is different again. A 200 L barrel with a follower plate wastes almost nothing, but a barrel opened and left between shifts can skin over; the loss is then measured in litres, not millilitres.
Choosing by throughput, not by price list
| Weekly volume | Format | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10 cartridges | Cartridge | No gun investment, no shelf-life risk |
| 10–40 cartridges | Sausage | One gun, fewer changes, less waste |
| 40+ cartridges or a line | Barrel + pump | Lowest cost per litre, needs cleaning discipline |
| Repair and touch-up | Cartridge | Always keep a box, whatever the line uses |
The mistake is buying the format that has the lowest price per litre rather than the lowest cost per finished metre. A barrel in a shop that uses ten cartridges a week is the most expensive option on the list.
What this means for buyers
- Calculate cost per metre at your bead, not price per unit.
- Buy the sausage gun before the sausage, not after.
- Do not buy a barrel without the throughput to finish it inside its working life.
- Keep cartridges for repair and touch-up regardless of line volume.